Council approves video gaming

Vote surprises, and angers, opposition

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Print

By Robert J. Lifka

Contributing reporter

In the latest chapter of an ongoing saga, the Forest Park Village Council voted Monday to legalize video gaming in the village.

However, organizers of a petition drive to place a referendum on video gaming on the spring election ballot will continue the saga until at least Jan. 3, the deadline for filing petitions, or even April 4, when the election will be held.

Although village officials voted 4-0 with one abstention to legalize video gaming in the village, multiple developments remain, which likely will stretch the process into 2017.

"We have a number of steps to take" before video gaming will actually exist in the village, said Mayor Anthony Calderone, who abstained from voting.

He later explained that he felt it was in his best interest to abstain since he also serves as the village liquor control commissioner.

The village's application process has to be finalized although Calderone said that will happen "in short order."

However, video gaming applications also must be approved by state of Illinois officials, who, he explained, have their own criteria, which "could take a couple of months."

It remains to be seen how many bar and restaurant owners will be willing to pay over $5,000 in fees for a Class V supplemental liquor license, which would allow video gaming, for an activity that could end in a matter of months, depending on a possible binding referendum.

Restaurant and bar owners in the village have pressed village officials to allow video gaming in Forest Park, claiming they cannot compete with similar businesses in other villages that have it. But there have been at least three attempts by those in opposition of video gaming to get a referendum on the ballot to allow local voters to decide on the issue.

The move by Patrick Jacknow, a local realtor, and other residents to place a binding referendum on the Nov. 8 ballot was met by legal challenges that kept the issue off the ballot, but Jacknow and others are working to try again in the spring.

With many of the overflow crowd standing along the back and side walls of the council chambers Monday, village officials had set up two podiums for public comment, one for those in favor of video gaming and the other for those against it.

Of the nine residents who spoke at Monday's meeting, only one supported video gaming. Many of those who spoke against video gaming also criticized village officials for taking action now rather than waiting for the results of the proposed referendum.

Noel Eberline of Yearbook drew applause when he said having a third podium for those wanting village officials to wait until after the proposed referendum would have "a line out the door."

Although several other anti-video gaming speakers also drew applause for their comments, pro-video gaming supporters made their presence known with loud applause after the vote was taken.

Commissioners Joseph Byrnes and Tom Mannix addressed calls for them to delay the vote until after the proposed referendum by noting the council action does not prevent residents from collecting signatures and forcing a vote on the issue.

Referring to the legalization of video gaming as a "trial basis," Byrnes said, "If it's not working, I'll be the first one to vote it down."

In response to Commissioner Rachell Entler's question, Calderone explained that the ordinance prohibits signage on the exterior of a building.

Entler also asked about so-called "video cafes," a concern many residents have shared at video gaming forums and elsewhere. Unlike bars and restaurants that draw in regular patrons to eat or drink and offer video gaming on the side, the primary purpose of a video café is video gaming.

Calderone responded by explaining that wording in the ordinance will make it impossible, or at least very difficult, for a video café to open in Forest Park. He said a Class V license will only be available to a business holding a Class A liquor license for at least a year. He also noted that all Class A licenses are taken and no new ones can be issued unless an existing Class A license holder relinquishes his license or the number of licenses available is increased, which can happen only by village council action.

In response to a question from Commissioner Dan Novak, Calderone went on to explain that the ordinance creates the Class V license category but does not make any available. The decision on how many Class V licenses to make available will be made by the council at a future meeting, he said.

If each of the 42 eligible businesses pay the $5,000 Class V license fee and each business elects to install five video gaming terminals — the most allowed — and pay the $25 per terminal fee, the village could realize as much as $250,000 annually, Calderone said. However, he noted not all of the 42 eligible businesses are likely to apply and not all those that do are likely to opt for the maximum number of terminals.

After the meeting, Calderone defended taking the action now rather than waiting for the results of the proposed referendum.

"This has been under consideration for a year and a half," he said. "There has been a village public forum, other public forums and official discussion.

"It's a contentious issue but sooner or later we have to take action."   

Love the Review?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Forest Park Review and ForestParkReview.com. We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

8 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Amber Ladeira from Forest Park, IL  

Posted: October 26th, 2016 9:56 AM

RE: the VG vote: I paid close attention at the Monday night meeting, where a lot of rude behavior from the audience certainly did not dignify the proceedings. As a related observation, all this cant locally and nationally about "our democracy" betrays a shocking lack of understanding about our country. Since its founding, the U.S. has been a republic; check the Pledge of Allegiance, which everyone at that meeting recited, to say nothing of Benjamin Franklin. "What sort of government have you given us, Dr. Franklin?" queried a woman right after he signed the Constitution on September 17, 1787. "A Republic, madam, if you can keep it." Franklin meant we must remain as informed and involved in the polity as possible. But there is no direct democracy on Earth--there never was, including Ancient Greece, which created the concept, as they had slaves, including professors. (- !) Lastly, The Electoral College elects our presidents, not you and me; they are free to vote their own convictions and eschew the popular will. History lesson over, I wish us all well.

Gretchen Colavito from Forest Park  

Posted: October 26th, 2016 6:50 AM

This reeks of village and bar owner greed. The last thing Forest Park needs is video gaming or another bar. I live close to Madison Street and often get rowdy bar patrons outside my bedroom window in the wee hours. Let the people decide what they want!! That's a democracy. Where do I sign this petition?

Evangeline Valhalla  

Posted: October 26th, 2016 6:33 AM

This is a terrible development! Yet again, officials have shown their total lack of regard for residents. Slobbering at the feet of bar owners is disgraceful. All the prettying up of Forest Park was merely distraction. So, I am curious...will we be changing our name to New Stone Park or Little Cicero?

Jolyn Crawford  

Posted: October 26th, 2016 5:07 AM

Omg, what a slap in the face to Forest Park residents! There goes 20 years of trying to elevate Forest Park's image especially Main Street. If Forest Park wants gambling, it should be separated from other businesses and big, like a Riverboat Casino on Des Plaines River!

Jerry Webster  

Posted: October 26th, 2016 1:11 AM

Tom, good luck with your plan, I hope you can find 5 people willing to run, your are going to need it. But if you can you need to strat now. Build a base, get out and talk to people, you can not wait, start now

Jason Hawk  

Posted: October 25th, 2016 7:10 PM

Well, well... Forest Park, the land of junkies and gamblers, where mindless politicians are owned by pub owners... SHAME!

Bill Dwyer  

Posted: October 25th, 2016 6:39 PM

Tom, the first step in taking action against a politician you oppose is to know when they're up for election, and the current village council isn't up for re-election until April 2019.

Tom O'Connell  

Posted: October 25th, 2016 5:19 PM

Shame on our village officials. They truly do not care what their constituents think. It is high time we vote all of them out of office in April. They do not represent us. We need to be vigilant in keeping video gambling out of our village.

Facebook Connect

Community Guide 2019 - 2020

To view the full print edition of the Forest Park Review 2019 - 2020 Community Guide, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Forest Park.


            
SubscribeClassified
MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Latest Comments