Volunteers appeal video gaming decision to circuit court

County judge will hear and decide referendum case on Feb. 15

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Nona Tepper

The battle over video gaming in Forest Park continued in Cook County Circuit Court on Feb. 1, as a judge outlined the next steps in deciding whether a binding referendum question will be included on an upcoming election ballot.

Associate Judge James Carroll highlighted the timeline for appealing the ruling of the village's electoral board. On Jan. 23, the electoral board decided to disqualify more than 200 pages of a referendum petitions submitted by a group called Let Forest Park Vote on Video Gaming because six of those pages had a heading that differed from the rest.

James Watts, a Madison Street bar owner, had challenged the referendum petition. That challenge was heard by a three-person electoral board that included Forest Park Mayor Anthony Calderone, Clerk Vanessa Moritz and Commissioner Tom Mannix.

The local electoral board, against the advice of its attorney, decided to disqualify the entire petition instead of just the six pages that bore a different heading.

Village Attorney Tom Bastian said he thought throwing out only the six petition sheets with an incorrect referendum date of Nov. 8, 2016 would be the appropriate remedy. The six sheets with the different heading contained less than 100 of the nearly 3,000 valid signatures on the petitions.

Carroll will hear and decide the case at 11:30 a.m. on Feb. 15 in Room 1707 of the Richard J. Daley Center, 50 W. Washington St. in Chicago.

"I think the law is on our side, and I think Judge Carroll will agree with us," said attorney Ed Mullen, who represents Let Forest Park Vote. 

If Carroll rules in favor of Let Forest Park Vote, the question "Shall video gaming be prohibited in the village of Forest Park?" will be included on the November 2018 election ballot, according to the Cook County Clerk. 

Let Forest Park Vote's question is binding, which means that if a majority of Forest Parkers vote against the practice, video gaming — which is now allowed — will be outlawed in the village.

The pro-referendum group originally wanted its question on the March 20 primary ballot, but three advisory referendum questions had already been submitted for that ballot in November 2016. Only three questions are allowed on any ballot per state law.

Moritz certified the advisory questions for the March ballot on Jan. 10.

Mullen must submit a brief to the court by Feb. 6. Attorney James Nally, who represents Watts, must submit a reply to Let Forest Park Vote's brief by Feb. 9.

Reader Comments

1 Comment - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Greg Mitchell from Forest Park  

Posted: February 7th, 2018 1:52 PM

Just so you are aware, the below are the pressing questions that will be on the March 2018 ballot, instead of the video gaming question. As these are non-binding (and superfluous) referenda on the ballot to block the video gaming question I will be leaving these questions unanswered. I would encourage those of you that feel a vote on gaming is appropriate to leave them blank as well. If, in fact, there are as many people that feel like a gaming vote is appropriate and leave the questions blank it will hopefully send a signal to the powers that be. Village of Forest Park, Homeowner Grants Should the Village of Forest Park continue offering grants to homeowners for flood remediation purposes? Village of Forest Park, Gaming Revenue Should the Village of Forest Park's share of video gaming revenue be used to fund our police and fire pension funds, resulting in lower property taxes? Village of Forest Park, Plow Sidewalks Should the Village of Forest Park continue to plow all sidewalks in the community?

Facebook Connect

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Forest Park.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad