Police intern's lawyers contend she was employee

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Jean Lotus


Attorneys for a Forest Park Police Department intern, who filed a federal lawsuit alleging sexual assault by a Forest Park detective, has filed a response to the village's motion to dismiss.

Loevy & Loevy, Chicago attorneys for "Jane Doe," who was 19 at the time of the allegations, disputed the village's assertion that Detective Young Lee was not on duty and was not in a supervisory role over Doe when Lee accompanied her to a pub in Berwyn March 30, 2011, which she initially believed to be an "alcohol sting."

Crucial to Doe's Title VII claim against the Village of Forest Park are whether Doe was an employee of the village and whether Lee was in a supervisory role over Doe, her attorneys said.

According to Doe's response brief, she was an employee of the village because she had entered into an arrangement with Lt. Steven Weiler to work at the department as a payment plan for parking tickets owed to the village.

"Doe owed $3,450, but Lt. Weiler cut this amount down to $400," Doe's lawyers say in the brief. "Lt. Weiler agreed to pay Doe $20 per hour from doing alcohol stings toward her tickets." According to the brief, she worked 18-30 hours a week entering citations on the computer or organizing the department's files. She most often worked with Lee as her supervisor, according to Doe's lawyers. Although the liquor enforcement program was officially managed by another officer in the department, Doe's lawyers submitted documents showing Lee was given a supervisory role in the alcohol sting events, which were paid for with grant money.

"The village's position is that he was not her supervisor," said Doe's lawyer Elizabeth Wang. "But an employee can have more than one supervisor. [She] counts as an employee and the law does apply to the village in terms of Detective Lee and my client."

If Lee is determined to have been Doe's supervisor, the standard of liability for the village is stricter, from negligence to strict liability, said Village Attorney Julie Bruch in February.

Wang also said her client's suit depended on claims that the police department did not adequately create a climate that discouraged sexual harassment and sexual misconduct among its force of 38 officers.

The suit says the department "directly encourages the very type of misconduct at issue here, by failing to adequately train, supervise and control its officers ... leading Forest Park police officers to believe their actions will never be scrutinized and directly encouraging future abuses."

Wang said Monday the village's procedure for punishing officers accused of sexual misconduct, abuse or harassment was flawed. Even though the village provided sexual harassment seminars for officers in 2009 and 2010, Wang said the seminars weren't working.

"[Sexual misconduct] has happened a lot in that department," Wang said. "We presented evidence that Forest Park's police department had a problem with sex assault or harassment every year between 2007-2011. In a department as small as Forest Park, that's a real red flag."

Wang said that the Police Chief James Ryan's testimony in depositions for the case makes it clear that the department fails to deter officers from committing sexual misconduct.

Ryan testified in deposition that after an independent investigation had determined that Lee had behaved in conduct unbecoming an officer, he gave Lee a 15-day suspension and revoked 15 vacation days. But Ryan said in deposition that he didn't make the reason for Lee's suspension public.

"Everybody knew exactly what was transpiring with Officer Lee," Ryan said in deposition. "I do not publicly — and I have never publicly discussed investigations, discipline of any employee."

Wang said Ryan's procedure was inadequate and led to officers believing sexual misconduct was not taken seriously.

"[Ryan] can say all the wants that we don't tolerate it, but when it keeps happening on an annual basis, there is something wrong," Wang said. "Nobody is made aware of what discipline is given out when they are accused [of sexual misconduct]. It's important that officers know that the department will not tolerate it and there will be consequences."

Wang said the village's next step is to file a response by April 12 and then the judge would rule.

"We're hoping for a trial toward the end of the year," said Wang, noting that a separate lawsuit against Lee had not resulted in a motion for summary judgment. That means the judge will hear a trial sooner in Doe's complaint against Lee, she said.

"If any judgment is awarded for compensatory damages [against Lee], the village would have to indemnify him for those. As far as punitive damages awarded, those would come out of Lee's own pocket. That's a legal issue for the judge to determine."

Email: jlotus@forestparkreview.com Twitter: @FP_Review

Love the Review?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Forest Park Review and ForestParkReview.com. We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

4 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Wm Wilcox from FP  

Posted: March 21st, 2013 7:47 AM

Derek, does it matter where the crime took place? Are the laws in Berwyn different than in FP? Is knowingly buying alcohol for a minor not a crime in Berwyn? The fact that the "adult" was an officer of the law and there was no question of the minor's age leaves no question that Lee "KNOWINGLY" violated the law. Ryan did not set a good example or show leadership by not charging Lee and Lee got off easy.

Bill from Melrose Park South  

Posted: March 20th, 2013 6:33 PM

The thought process of Derek St. Holmes is more addled than Ted Nugent after snorting too much gun powder. Who's blaming Ryan, DSH? Not Wm., and not the Review, They're just quoting an attorney making an argument. And, as usual, DSH and others just can't resist the impulse to spew on the FPR because it's owned by Oak Park residents. And Wm.? Lee lost his detective badge, is back on patrol, and won't likely receive another plum assignment. Along with the pay dock, isn't that enough punishment?

Wm Wilcox from FP  

Posted: March 20th, 2013 8:11 AM

Officer Lee should be prosecuted for providing liquor to a minor and given a penalty greater than a non-police officer. Whether Chicago or Forest Park this is another example of cops being held to a lower standard. chief ryan, can you say "do as I say, not as I do?" Officer Lee cannot be trusted and should not be involved in any sexual abuse case.

Bill from Melrose Park South  

Posted: March 19th, 2013 10:19 PM

I think Ofc. Lee is reaping the consequences he's earned for his stupid conduct, but, please. Ms. Doe is an employee?....She did ONE day of alcohol stings, at three stores. If the Loevy and Loevy law firm paid someone $60 or $80 for half a day's work, you can bet they'd argue vociferously that the person was a 1099 independent contractor and not a formal employee. But since they're looking for the biggest pay out they can get, they'll jump through logical hoops to frame this in their favor.

Facebook Connect

Community Guide 2019 - 2020

To view the full print edition of the Forest Park Review 2019 - 2020 Community Guide, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Forest Park.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Latest Comments