Why I'm voting for Rory

Opinion: Columns

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Print

By Tom Holmes

This column is perhaps more of a confession than an endorsement.

I'm going to vote for Rory Hoskins next Tuesday, because I resonate with him. It's an intuitive thing.

Candidates often try to get votes by rationally laying out what they will do if elected. That's what this newspaper tends to focus on. What do Chris and Rory say they will do about the Altenheim property or to get the village out of its fiscal hole or to prevent flooding or to promote Forest Park's economy.

Both Chris and Rory have well thought out proposals which on the whole I agree with. No, why I'm going to vote for Rory has less to do with reason than my intuition.

Do you remember Barack Obama's keynote speech to the Democratic Convention in 2004? I don't remember a word he said, but I remember vividly how that speech moved me. It wasn't mainly my head that was responding to him, but neither was it primarily my heart. The effect was not mainly rational nor emotional.  

It was intuitive. The online Free Dictionary defines intuition as "the faculty of knowing or understanding something without reasoning or proof" or "an impression or insight gained by the use of this faculty."

Now, Rory has a long way to go to approach Obama's magic as a speaker. In fact, I thought Chris performed much better than Rory at the forum held at the Middle School last Thursday. I understood every word Chris said both in terms of diction and conceptual clarity. Rory at times kind of mumbled and sometimes turned away from the mic in the direction of the moderator which made it impossible to hear what he was saying.

When Chris threw a negative, ad hominem barb it stung, because he is good with words, but when Rory tried to respond in kind, he just couldn't pull it off.

So, I'm not going to vote for Rory, because his platform is so much more compelling than the one Chris is presenting and certainly not because of his skill at public speaking.

It's, rather, an intuitive thing. It's why I become close friends with some people and not with others. It's an intuitive thing. It's why I join one political party and not another. It's an intuitive thing. It's why I'm a Christian and not a Buddhist.

Jonathan Haidt is a moral psychologist who, in his book The Righteous Mind, argues that when we humans make moral decisions, intuition comes first and reasoning comes second.  In fact he contends that reason functions like a press secretary whose job is to make sense out of what is basically non-rational.  Picture Sarah Huckaby Sanders trying to defend her boss in front of TV cameras.

"Keep your eye on intuitions," Haidt urges, "and don't take people's moral arguments at face value.  They're mostly post hoc constructions. . .crafted to advance one or more strategic objectives."

That's why I probably won't convince any Chris Harris supporters to vote for Rory Hoskins by any rational arguments I could make—because it's an intuitive thing.  

Although intuition is not rational, I want to be clear that neither is it irrational.  Saying that the sun travels around the earth is irrational.  Saying that life begins at conception is not. That view is neither rational nor irrational.  It's intuitive.  Look at the definition.  Intuition is "the faculty of knowing or understanding something without reasoning or proof."

Maybe I'm using myself as a case study here. Does my claim that my reasons for voting for Rory are more intuitive than rational resonate intuitively with you? You see the humorous irony, right? If you don't buy what I'm saying, there's no way I can convince you by a rational argument. Because it's an intuitive thing. You either intuitively accept that what I'm saying about intuition or you don't.

The problem, if it's true that that intuition precedes reason in our decision making, is that intuition can be wrong. We all intuitively agreed that Donald Trump would lose in 2016, right? Turning from politics to religions, Jesus' disciples constantly misunderstood what he was telling them about the Kingdom of God, because his teaching was to them counter-intuitive. What? You want us to love our enemies and pray for those who persecute us? THAT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE!

One of my cousins said, "When I want to find out what is really true, I watch Fox news."

One of my friends said, "When I want to find out what is really true, I watch MSNBC."

All of this, of course, begs the question, "Where does intuition come from?"

I don't know the answer. We all have heard stories like one of the children of a pastor becomes an atheist and the other goes to seminary. Is it nature or nurture or just random? I don't know.

What I think I know—err what I intuitively know is that reason should have an honored role in our decision regarding whom to vote for next Tuesday, but reason also has its limitations.  

I'm going vote for Rory partly because I agree with most of his positions but also because I intuitively resonate with things like his demeanor, character, temperament and sense of how the world works.

Love the Review?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Forest Park Review and ForestParkReview.com. We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

1 Comment - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Robert C. Cox from Forest Park  

Posted: March 27th, 2019 9:55 AM

As I shared on social media 3/26 Forest Park 2019 election observation by an old Timer. Some people here in town like Michael Jackson, some like Ted Nugent. Some like dog parks, video gambling and raising chickens. Some residents like their old houses and others their condos. Some like Fenwick High School, others like PTHS, some like beer, even a few Forest Parkers like me. In my 64 years, I've seen and met 5 Forest Park Mayors, Mayor Vernon Reich living behind my house where I grew up on 400 Marengo. Mayor Meyer is my friend Dave 's grandfather, I learned how to swim from Lorraine Popelka before she was Mayor and requested my first Forest Park business license from her in 1979 and delivered newspapers to Mayor Marunde. Mayor Calderone was a fellow newsboy back then. Forest Parkers like and dislike different things, so how can you govern? The answer that I have come to learn? is to find the commonality of the body politic. Call it "common ground" or "the public good." What do neighbors and neighborhoods do to stay connected and involved with local government? That answer is to vote for candidates who can see this condition and build upon it together with all stakeholders including the ones that don't like what others think about or disagree upon. This is why I and my household are voting for Rory Hoskins for Mayor. He is not a superman or political boss. He likes family life here and He likes a notion of a better Forest Park ?just like I do. The difference is that he has the capacity as Mayor to do something about it. It is my expectation that Rory will make the hard decisions that break away from the status quo, resist special interests or rule by the chosen few and be sensitive to the common good of the community Bob Cox Forest Park Resident circa1954

Facebook Connect

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Forest Park.


            
SubscribeClassified
MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad