Anti-nepotism policy OK'd by council

4-1 vote fulfills pledge made by Hoskins

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter


Contributing Reporter

Since his April election, Forest Park Mayor Rory Hoskins has promised to institute an anti-nepotism policy for Forest Park's village government. Monday night, after a lively discussion among commissioners at a village board meeting, an anti-nepotism policy was adopted with one commissioner, Ryan Nero, opposing passage.

According to the official document, "It is the policy of the Village of Forest Park to provide equal employment opportunities and to base personnel procedures and hiring practices upon individual merit and qualification, rather than political or family advantage or favoritism." The document, which is just over two pages long, outlines the reasons for the policy and how it should be applied. It defines "relative," "family" and "supervisor/subordinate relationship" as it pertains to the new rules. And it details what sort of employee relationships are prohibited and how the policy applies to existing employees.

There are a few exceptions to the policy. One allows current employees in prohibited relationships to be grandfathered in and allowed to continue working for the village unless there is "impropriety or appearance of impropriety," in which case "appropriate steps" to ensure there are no conflicts of interest will be taken.

Also exempt from this policy are "uncompensated volunteers or interns, or employees hired through competitive exam administered by the Forest Park Board of Fire and Police Commissioners."

The discussion of the policy prior to the council's vote was thorough and initiated by Commissioner Nero, who cast the only vote against it. He made it clear that he supports the policy in general but wanted wording to ensure that the most qualified person for a village job, whether related to someone already working for the village or not, would be hired. He said he was "looking for a language change… to allow special circumstances to go before the commissioners and mayor." Nero said he wants to make sure that even if a potential employee is related to someone already working for the village, a "candidate who is the perfect fit for said position [should] at least have an opportunity" to apply. 

Commissioner Joe Byrnes also had concerns. He brought up summertime help, such as teenagers employed at the village. If they have a relative employed by the village, and they have to reapply each year for the job, they would be subject to this new policy, which states that "if a grandfathered employee terminates his or her employment and later re-applies, he/she would be subject to this policy," and therefore no longer eligible for the position. 

But Hoskins reminded the commissioners that this policy isn't being instituted to address teenage employees. He said the need for this policy grew out of a "relatively small number of households holding a disproportionate number of village jobs" and the perception this created. And he pointed out that "optics made a difference" to him when his own children were employed by the village. They didn't hold village positions while he served as commissioner. 

In fact, the policy makes it clear that not only are anti-nepotism practices important to ensure equal opportunities within the village, they're also important to protect the village's credibility. According to the policy, "perceptions" of nepotism "may weaken the credibility of the village." In another section of the document entitled "Prohibited Employee Relationships" it is stated that hiring a relative wouldn't be allowed in cases where there would be a "an actual conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest."

Nick Peppers, village attorney, said that this is a "policy, not code." It's "flexible," and should be viewed as a "placeholder to at least start with." He said the document can be amended once passed. Other villages, he commented, have a wide range of anti-nepotism policies, some basic and some extremely detailed. Hoskins concurred, stating that it would be difficult to get all the language in the policy perfect, and he doesn't want to see "perfect be the enemy of the good."

Love the Review?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Forest Park Review and We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

6 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Martin Tellalian  

Posted: September 6th, 2019 5:15 PM

Thanks to Mayor Hoskins and Village Council for implementing the anti-nepotism policy. Let's hope that other state and local units of governments see the benefits and inherent fairness of this policy. And although this policy was enacted a little after the first 100 days of this administration, it is just one of the positive steps that they have taken. Thanks and keep up the good work.

Mary Needham from Forest Park  

Posted: August 30th, 2019 7:33 PM

The council's decision is good policy and good government. The question isn't whether the Village should hire the best people. The question is whether the Village's elected officials and the public employees who serve Forest Park are impartial and neutral when assessing whether their relatives are the best candidates for a Village position. Most people can agree that is natural for individuals to hold an implicit bias in favor of their own relatives (or the relatives of their boss or co-workers). Even if the preference for relatives can truly be set aside, the hiring of relatives in government, corporations, and other organizations creates an appearance of impropriety and suggests that obtaining employment depends on "who you know." It is one of the many reasons that governments and corporations adopt anti-nepotism policies such as the one the Village has adopted.

Michelle Andres Fitz-Henry  

Posted: August 27th, 2019 8:45 PM

Sounds like a win-win. "It's a policy, not code" pretty much says if there is an extenuating circumstance it will be listed to. Glad it happened sooner rather than later.

Linda Fairbanks  

Posted: August 27th, 2019 8:32 PM

Good! Politics needs to serve the many, and be seen to do so. Village government also needs diversity, which won't happen in a mom & pop shop, no matter how qualified the family.

Rosalio Medina  

Posted: August 27th, 2019 6:15 PM

Has been so hard to implement anti nepotism rule specially on public entities if you check other villages you can find families and relatives there I think they are fornsure an amazing employees but please they has to stop using the public assets on personal level nepotism is not healthy at all and is every where I applaud Mr Mayor i hope other town take this as a first stone and move forward I am l disappointed with Mr Nero I hope he can learn more about that and throw more support to his mayor. We are watching. Their move .

Kate Nolan  

Posted: August 27th, 2019 5:23 PM

This is a long-overdue improvement! Well done.

Facebook Connect

Community Guide 2019 - 2020

To view the full print edition of the Forest Park Review 2019 - 2020 Community Guide, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Forest Park.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad

Latest Comments